Oddverse.com

disconnectedzeitgeist : Full Frontal

Full Frontal

An actual medical Doctor

Quick questions:

Is full-frontal nudity on television:

- never acceptable?
- acceptable in some sort of context?
- to be encouraged?

Next question:

Is the naked human body:

- a horrendous thing that nobody should ever have to see?
- a beautiful, special thing that one should only share with a lover?
- a natural thing that one should be comfortable with, regardless of shape?

And finally:

Should television:

- reflect all aspects of society?
- reflect a responsible view of society?
- shape society?
- be mainly programmes about willies and bums?

23 June, 2005

7 Comments

,

7 Comments

Comment #1
Posted by scooter
June 23, 2005 5:00 PM

c,c,a

Tempted to say d for the last one but won't.

Comment #2
Posted by drD
June 23, 2005 5:16 PM

All of the above - depending on how much beer has been drunk. I've seen just as many boobs and willies on Eurotrash as there are in the Sistine Chapel. [And the pope lives there].

Comment #3
Posted by Blue Witch
June 23, 2005 8:21 PM

Question 1: That depends on the purpose and time of the 'exposure'.

Question 2: Last answer, but societal pressure (ie emanating from the media) means that few people will ever be comfortble with who they are/how they look.

Question 3: Television causes more harm than good. Discuss.

Comment #4
Posted by Douglas
June 23, 2005 8:45 PM

1: Other
2: Other
3: It seems we have D already.

Comment #5
Posted by clair
June 24, 2005 9:43 AM

b,c,a...probably

Comment #6
Posted by harriet
June 24, 2005 3:30 PM

willies to catch up with tit exposure (or maybe tit exposure to go back down to willies exposure).

Comment #7
Posted by Gordon
June 27, 2005 12:15 PM

I'm with clair - b, c, a.

about

oddverse.com is the personal web site of Alan Taylor, and the views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of other people with an oddverse.com e-mail address.

powered By Movable Type Pro 5.12

This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.